Science, Zen, and the Art of Relationships

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
   Why Relationships Matter in a Fractured and Interconnected World
   
2. Social Skills, Relationships, and Community
   The Foundation of Human Connection and the Spectrum of Social Competence
   
3. The Earth and Ecosystems as Greater Community
   Biological Roots of Social Behavior and the Ecology of Relationship
   
4. Human Relationships
   Mapping the Types and Dynamics of Human Connection Across Life
   
5. Romantic Relationships: The Biology, Psychology, and Dynamics of Love
   Desire, Diversity, and Modern Models of Intimacy
   
6. Eastern Morality and Enlightenment
   Moderation, Compassion, and the Middle Way in Relationship Ethics
   
7. Buddhist Tradition and Sexual Desire
   Lay Practice, Monastic Boundaries, and the Ethical Use of Desire
   
8. Western Morality and Relationship Worldviews
   Duty, Virtue, and the Evolving Ethics of the West
   
9. Modern Science and Sexual Desire
   Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Erotic Life
   
10. Global Society, Social Mores, Ethics, and Politics
    How Culture, Class, and Communication Shape Human Relationships
    
11. Conclusion: The Art and Science of Connection
    Living Well Together in a Complex and Changing World
    

Introduction

Why Relationships Matter in a Fractured and Interconnected World

We are living in an age of paradox. Never before have human beings been so connected, and yet never have so many felt so isolated. We carry entire networks in our pockets but struggle with loneliness in our hearts. We live among billions, yet social trust is declining, civility is strained, and many people—especially the young—feel more alienated than empowered.

At the same time, political division, economic uncertainty, climate crisis, and digital disruption are rapidly reshaping the fabric of society. In this atmosphere, the ability to relate—honestly, skillfully, and ethically—has become not only a personal challenge but a collective necessity. Social media, workplace dynamics, romantic expectations, cultural pluralism, and global interdependence all demand new levels of relational literacy.

This article explores the science of relationships—from biology to philosophy, from ancient traditions to modern technologies. It examines how our earliest attachments shape our futures, how cultural worldviews guide love and friendship, how global systems influence our intimate lives, and how wisdom traditions East and West have grappled with desire, morality, and human connection.

At its heart, this is a call to reclaim the relational dimension of human life—to see connection not as a luxury, but as a core human need and a cornerstone of a sane and sustainable world. In a time of rising isolation and division, understanding the dynamics of human relationships may be one of the most urgent forms of science, philosophy, and activism we can pursue.

Social Skills, Relationships, and Community

No one is born a social genius. Like language, mathematics, or music, social skills must be learned, developed, and refined over time. Mastery in social interaction is not an innate gift reserved for a few, but rather a lifelong process of growth and adaptation. In fact, the study and practice of social skills and interpersonal understanding should be considered a lifelong discipline—one that evolves alongside our personal, professional, and civic lives.

Social skills are the abilities that enable people to communicate, relate, and cooperate effectively with others. These include verbal and non-verbal communication, emotional empathy, listening, persuasion, conflict resolution, and the ability to recognize and respect social norms. The process of acquiring and improving these abilities is known as socialization—a complex interplay of learning that takes place in families, schools, religious institutions, workplaces, and all forms of community life.

There is no single profile of a “socially skilled person.” Social ability exists on a spectrum and manifests in many different forms. Some individuals may be naturally empathic but struggle with assertiveness. Others may be persuasive but need to cultivate better listening habits. These variations are not failures—they are reflections of the human condition and the diverse social roles we are each called upon to play.

At its core, a relationship is the way in which two or more beings are connected, behave toward one another, and emotionally respond to one another. Relationships can be personal, professional, political, familial, romantic, or spiritual. They are foundational to every community, and they are shaped—often profoundly—by the social skills of the individuals involved.

Relationships, in turn, form the fabric of community. A community is not merely a group of people who live in proximity or share a label; it is a web of dynamic relationships built on mutual recognition, shared values, communication, and cooperation. Every community, whether a small village, a religious order, or an international society, functions through a system of relationships—each guided by spoken and unspoken rules of engagement.

But human relationships are rarely simple. Emotions, needs, cultural differences, and personal histories make them wonderfully rich—and often difficult. Humans are not mind-readers; misunderstandings, disappointments, and conflicts are natural and inevitable. Social skills serve as the compass by which we navigate these complexities: they help us clarify intentions, repair harm, build trust, and sustain connection.

Ultimately, social skills are not just tools for individual success. They are the building blocks of families, communities, societies, and civilizations. They are the art and science of human connection—the essential glue that holds together the evolving mosaic of human life.

The Earth and Ecosystems as Greater Community

Before the emergence of human society, the natural world had already long operated on intricate systems of relationship. From symbiotic bonds between fungi and tree roots to predator-prey dynamics and the courtship dances of birds, the biosphere is an evolving web of interconnected lives. Every organism exists not in isolation but in a network of relationships—with other species, with its environment, and with the ongoing flow of energy and life.

Biologically, social behavior did not originate in humans. It has deep evolutionary roots across the animal kingdom. Cooperative hunting, mating rituals, territorial negotiation, parenting behaviors, and even primitive forms of empathy or warning systems can be observed in wolves, dolphins, elephants, birds, and insects. These behaviors serve reproductive and survival functions, shaped by millions of years of natural selection. Sociality, in biological terms, is an adaptive strategy—one that increases the likelihood of thriving in complex environments.

Plants too engage in forms of community. Through root systems and fungal networks (mycorrhizal symbiosis), they share nutrients and even biochemical signals. Forests operate as ecologies of cooperation and competition, with species evolving traits to attract pollinators, defend against pests, or grow in coordination with others. In this sense, relationship is not only a human concern but a biological universal—woven into the very structure of life on Earth.

As human beings emerged from this ecological background, they carried with them inherited instincts for connection, cooperation, and caregiving. But with language, abstract thought, and culture came a new dimension of social life: the symbolic, emotional, and moral structures that define human communities.

The Brief History of Settlement and Civilization

For most of human history, people lived in small, mobile groups—hunter-gatherer societies held together by kinship, oral traditions, and direct reciprocity. Relationships in such communities were immediate and personal. As agriculture emerged and humans began to settle, societies grew larger and more complex. This shift gave rise to new forms of organization—villages, towns, cities, states—and with them, more formal institutions of law, religion, education, and governance.

Settlement brought both opportunity and tension. Hierarchies emerged. Resources became centralized. Conflicts required management beyond personal negotiation. From these pressures arose the earliest sciences of human behavior—proto-anthropology in the form of myths and customs, and the first political philosophies etched in stone or codified in scripture.

Over time, civilizations developed increasingly elaborate systems of relationship: legal codes, marriage practices, class systems, trade networks, and diplomatic treaties. Human beings became not just social animals, but civic ones—members of imagined orders larger than family or tribe.

From Biology to the Human Sciences

The study of these evolving human relationships gave rise to the disciplines we now call anthropology, sociology, and social psychology. Anthropology investigates how cultures form, change, and relate across time and geography. Sociology examines the structures and functions of society, including institutions, norms, and group dynamics. Social psychology explores how individuals think, feel, and behave in relation to others, including phenomena like conformity, identity, prejudice, and attachment.

Together, these sciences form the foundation of our modern understanding of human relationships. They trace how biology, culture, and environment interact to shape everything from intimacy and friendship to political alliances and religious belonging.

The story of relationships, then, is not only personal—it is planetary, evolutionary, historical, and scientific. To understand ourselves and each other fully, we must recognize that we are part of larger communities: ecological, ancestral, and global. Only by studying the roots of relationship—across species and centuries—can we begin to master the art of living together wisely.

Human Relationships

Human relationships span a vast and intricate spectrum—from the passing glance of a stranger to the lifelong bonds of family, friendship, and love. Each relationship exists within a context, shaped by roles, responsibilities, expectations, and emotional resonance. To understand the science of relationships, it is essential first to map the broad categories of human interaction—each with its own psychological, cultural, and sometimes biological dynamics.

The Spectrum of Human Relationship Types

1. Strangers and Fellow Beings
   Even before we speak or engage, we are in relation. Every human being is a global citizen, an inhabitant of Earth, and a member of the family of life. This broadest level of relationship includes our connection to strangers, fellow citizens, distant cultures, and even non-human sentient beings. Ethical, political, and ecological implications arise from this foundational level of relationship.
   
2. Practical and Transactional Interactions
   Everyday interactions—brief, functional, and often anonymous—include customer-service exchanges, public transportation etiquette, marketplace negotiations, and communication among strangers in shared spaces. These relationships are fleeting but critical to social functioning.
   
3. Family Relationships
   
   • Immediate Family: Parents, children, and siblings form our first and most formative relationships, shaping our attachment styles, emotional vocabulary, and early moral frameworks.
     
   • Extended Family: Grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins expand our network of care, obligation, and support across generations.
     
4. Friendship
   Friends are the chosen kin of social life. These relationships are based on mutual affection, shared interests, trust, and emotional support. Friendships vary in depth and duration but are among the most rewarding and psychologically nourishing human bonds.
   
5. Community and Social Networks
   
   • Friends of Friends / Local Community: These ties form the informal social network that builds trust, social capital, and resilience.
     
   • Online Communities: Digital age interactions add a new dimension, allowing global relationships based on interest rather than proximity.
     
6. Educational Relationships
   
   • Classmates and Peers: These relationships are structured by shared goals and developmental stages.
     
   • Teacher–Learner and Mentor–Apprentice: Such relationships model hierarchical knowledge transfer, built on guidance, trust, and responsibility.
     
7. Professional and Economic Relationships
   
   • Workplace Relationships: Include colleagues, subordinates, supervisors—structured by organizational roles and norms.
     
   • Professional–Client: Lawyers, therapists, doctors, teachers—these roles carry formal duties of care, ethics, and confidentiality.
     
   • Business and Contractual Relationships: Partners, investors, customers—relationships built on agreement, trust, and regulation.
     
   • Donor–Nonprofit Dynamics: Motivated by altruism, influence, or reputation, these relationships have unique power and communication dynamics.
     
   • Corporate and Institutional Relationships: Interactions between entities or departments, often governed by law, diplomacy, and systemic expectations.
     
8. Governmental and Civic Relationships
   
   • Residents of Cities, Counties, and States: Individuals interact with local institutions and infrastructure: libraries, police, hospitals, public services.
     
   • Compatriots and Citizens: Shared identity, rights, and duties bind people together in a political community.
     
   • International and Diplomatic Relationships: Include treaties, cultural exchanges, foreign aid, and warfare—all shaped by national identity and geopolitics.
     
9. Religious and Spiritual Relationships
   
   • Intra-Religious Relationships: Within one’s own tradition—among clergy, laity, elders, youth, and fellow practitioners.
     
   • Interfaith Relations: Between different traditions, often involving diplomacy, ethics, and cooperation (or historical conflict).
     
10. Historical and Adversarial Relationships
    
    • Former or Current Enemies: Between nations, peoples, classes, or ideological groups—these relationships carry legacies of trauma, grievance, and reconciliation.
      
    • Prisoner–Captor / Enslaved–Enslaver: These are extreme, coercive relationships marked by power imbalances, trauma, and moral concern. Studying them illuminates the darkest potentials of human sociality.
      

---

The First Relationships of Our Lives

Human social development begins in the womb and continues through the intimate sphere of early life. Our first relationships—those with our mother, father, and caregivers—are the foundation of our emotional and cognitive development. These initial bonds teach us safety, language, love, and identity.

As we grow, our relational world expands:

• Residential Community: Neighbors, service workers, playground peers
  
• Religious Community: Clergy, youth group leaders, fellow congregants
  
• School Community: Teachers, classmates, school administrators
  
• Parents’ Professional Community: The social sphere of our guardians introduces us to class, occupation, and professional norms
  
• Local Civic Community: Public servants, healthcare workers, librarians, law enforcement
  
• Fraternal Organizations: Masonic lodges, Rotary, Lions, Eagles—these shape identity through ritual, philanthropy, and social service
  
• Digital Communities: In modern childhood, online relationships influence identity formation, values, and communication style
  

These early webs of relationship set the stage for our later roles as adults in larger and more complex networks—social, professional, national, and global. The trajectory of human life is in large part the evolution of our relationships: how we form them, nurture them, and transform through them.

Romantic Relationships: The Biology, Psychology, and Dynamics of Love

Few aspects of human life evoke more fascination, longing, joy, pain, and confusion than romantic relationships. Across cultures and histories, love has been celebrated as divine, dangerous, redemptive, or mysterious. But modern science has begun to shed light on the biology, psychology, and social structures that underlie what we call love—and the diverse forms that romantic connection can take.

What Is Love?

Love is not a single feeling but a complex interplay of biological drives, emotional attachments, psychological patterns, and cultural expectations. The ancient Greeks famously distinguished between types of love: eros (romantic and sexual desire), philia (friendship), agape (selfless, often spiritual love), and storge (familial love). Contemporary research suggests that these categories reflect real psychological distinctions and biological systems.

Love is not merely a poetic sentiment—it is a survival strategy. Romantic love serves reproductive, bonding, and social purposes. The experience of falling in love is often characterized by increased energy, focus, and euphoria—linked to elevated levels of dopamine, norepinephrine, and oxytocin. Long-term love is supported by attachment and trust, mediated by oxytocin and vasopressin, creating emotional stability and partnership beyond the reproductive phase.

The Biology of Sex and Love

Sexual attraction and romantic attachment are driven by an interplay between hormones (such as testosterone and estrogen), neurotransmitters (especially dopamine and serotonin), and evolved behavioral cues. Physical traits that signal fertility, health, and compatibility often play a role in initial attraction, though personality, values, and emotional resonance become more important in long-term pair bonding.

From an evolutionary perspective, humans are moderately pair-bonded with flexible mating strategies. This flexibility explains the wide variation in how individuals approach love, sex, and partnership—ranging from serial monogamy to polyamory, celibacy, and lifelong partnerships.

Gender, Identity, and Inclusivity

Modern science now recognizes that romantic and sexual relationships cannot be fully understood without accounting for gender diversity and sexual orientation. Romantic love occurs in all human societies, and same-sex and non-binary relationships are as psychologically valid and biologically meaningful as heterosexual relationships.

• LGBTQ+ identities expand our understanding of the human capacity for love. Love between two men, two women, or people of non-binary or transgender experience may face unique social challenges, but the underlying biology of affection, bonding, and desire is consistent across orientations.
  
• Transgender and gender-diverse individuals may experience love and relationships in ways shaped both by their personal identities and by societal perceptions, requiring extra layers of self-awareness, resilience, and mutual understanding in partnership.
  

Science supports the view that gender and sexuality exist on a spectrum. As societies evolve toward greater inclusivity, romantic relationships will increasingly reflect the full range of human diversity.

Varieties of Romantic Life

Not everyone experiences or seeks romantic connection in the same way. Scientific and psychological frameworks acknowledge a wide range of romantic lifestyles and orientations:

• Singles or De Facto Singles (Not Seeking Love): Some people live happily without romantic partners, finding fulfillment in other relationships or in solitude.
  
• Involuntary Singles (Seeking Love): Others experience loneliness and desire romantic connection but may struggle with self-esteem, opportunity, or emotional barriers.
  
• Disillusioned Singles (No Longer Seeking): Some may withdraw from dating due to repeated disappointment or trauma, often seeking healing in other aspects of life.
  
• Casual Daters or Relationship Explorers: Some prefer short-term relationships, seeing romance as play, exploration, or companionship without permanence.
  
• Monogamous Partnerships: Many choose long-term exclusive relationships, often framed by cultural or personal values of commitment, family, and fidelity.
  
• Open or Polyamorous Relationships: Others engage in multiple romantic relationships simultaneously—with openness, honesty, and ethical agreement.
  
• Hybrid Models: Some combine long-term partnerships with casual or short-term relationships, adapting traditional structures to modern realities.
  

There is no single “correct” model of love. What matters most is mutual respect, consent, communication, and emotional well-being.

Flirting and Hooking Up

Romantic initiation often begins with flirting—a culturally informed ritual of signaling interest, openness, and attraction. According to social anthropologist Jean Smith, flirting is a vital part of human courtship that allows individuals to test mutual attraction and emotional resonance without immediate commitment. Flirting involves body language, eye contact, humor, mirroring, and subtle touch—and varies across cultures and personalities.

Hookup culture—casual sexual encounters without long-term expectations—has become more common, particularly among younger adults in urban or digital environments. While such encounters can be liberating or pleasurable for some, they can also highlight the need for communication, boundaries, and emotional literacy. Scientific studies show that satisfaction in such encounters depends on mutual consent, emotional readiness, and clarity of intent.

Limerence and Attachment Styles

Romantic obsession, often experienced in early stages of attraction, is sometimes referred to as limerence—an intense emotional state characterized by intrusive thoughts, longing, and idealization of the partner. Limerence can produce euphoria but also anxiety and irrationality. It is biologically similar to addiction, driven by dopamine circuits, and often fades with time.

Understanding attachment styles can help people make sense of their relationship patterns. Based on early childhood experiences, people typically develop one of four main attachment styles:

• Secure: Comfortable with intimacy and autonomy; emotionally responsive.
  
• Anxious: Craves closeness, fears abandonment, seeks reassurance.
  
• Avoidant: Values independence, fears vulnerability, may withdraw.
  
• Disorganized: Combines conflicting desires for closeness and fear of intimacy.
  

These styles influence how people seek, maintain, and interpret romantic relationships—and can evolve through conscious effort and emotional healing.

For more on limerence and attachment, see: AttachmentProject.com on Limerence

Family Planning

Romantic relationships often intersect with family planning—the conscious decision to have, postpone, or avoid children. While not all romantic relationships involve reproduction, many do eventually include shared decisions about parenting, fertility, contraception, or child-free living.

Effective family planning requires open communication, mutual respect, and a clear understanding of shared values and goals. Scientific advances in fertility, reproductive health, contraception, and assisted reproduction have expanded the possibilities for all types of couples—including LGBTQ+ families—to participate in the creation and care of new life.

Eastern Morality and Enlightenment

A Relational Philosophy of Life

In many Eastern traditions, the moral life is defined not by rigid commandments but by attunement—a dynamic balance between internal desires, external actions, and the larger flow of nature, society, and spirit. Human relationships, from friendship and family to love and sexuality, are seen not as isolated acts but as flowing elements within a cosmic order. Morality is less about prohibition and more about moderation, mindfulness, and the pursuit of harmony.

The Principle of Moderation

Moderation is a central theme across Eastern systems of ethics and psychology. From the Middle Way of the Buddha to the balancing forces of yin and yang in Daoism, Eastern morality encourages neither repression nor indulgence, but a cultivated path between extremes. To live well is to find balance—in desire, in emotion, and in social conduct.

Excess, obsession, and grasping (whether for power, pleasure, or ego validation) are seen as root causes of suffering. Yet, desire itself is not always condemned. Desire, when tempered and approached with awareness, becomes fuel for compassion, growth, and joy.

---

Philosophical Foundations

Hinduism, Ayurveda, and Yoga

In Hinduism and the Ayurvedic system of health, life is understood through the balance of energies (doshas), stages of life (ashramas), and proper alignment of body, mind, and spirit. Romantic and sexual relationships are woven into the ideal of dharma (righteous duty), with spiritual traditions recognizing the legitimacy of householders and celibates alike. The yogic path includes brahmacharya, often translated as celibacy, but more broadly meaning right use of energy—including sexual energy—for higher awareness.

Daoism and Yin-Yang Philosophy

Daoist ethics reject moral absolutes and instead emphasize attunement with the Dao—the ineffable way of nature. The Yin-Yang symbol reflects interdependence: passive and active, feminine and masculine, yielding and assertive. Human relationships, including sexual ones, are most fulfilling when they flow in harmony with natural rhythms and with respect for the vitality of both partners. Daoist texts also affirm the power of sexual union as an exchange of life force (qi), when approached with care and reverence.

Confucius and the Middle Way

Confucianism grounds morality in ren (benevolence), li (ritual propriety), and xiao (filial piety). While less focused on erotic or mystical love, Confucius stressed the importance of balanced, respectful relationships within families and societies. The “Doctrine of the Mean” (Zhongyong) proposes a life lived between extremes—with emotions, speech, and action all governed by harmony. Confucian ethics see relationships as the crucible of moral development.

Buddhism and the Noble Middle Way

Buddhist moral training emphasizes mindfulness (sati), wisdom (prajna), and compassion (karuna) as core elements of an enlightened life. The Buddha’s own awakening came through the realization that neither sensual indulgence nor extreme asceticism leads to freedom—but the Middle Way does.

Desire is viewed as the root of suffering not because pleasure is inherently evil, but because clinging, craving, and delusion distort our perception and trap us in cycles of dissatisfaction. Yet Mahayana Buddhism, especially as practiced in East Asia, embraces a more nuanced view. In Japanese Zen, for instance, the ideal is not suppression of desire, but freedom from compulsion through the realization of non-attachment. Moderation—not repression—is the true path.

---

What Is Compassion?

Compassion (karuna) in Eastern thought is not mere pity or sentimentality—it is the deep, existential response to the suffering of others, grounded in wisdom and interdependence. It means recognizing that others, like ourselves, wish to be free from pain, and acting from that recognition without attachment to outcomes. True compassion neither indulges nor judges—it uplifts without ego. It is the moral engine of the Bodhisattva ideal: to help all beings awaken.

---

What Is Wisdom?

Wisdom (prajna) is not just intelligence or knowledge—it is direct insight into the nature of reality. In Eastern traditions, wisdom is the ability to see the world as it is: impermanent, interconnected, and empty of fixed identity. It arises from meditation, ethical conduct, and experiential understanding. In relationships, wisdom helps us discern attachment from love, control from care, and illusion from truth.

---

What Is Enlightenment?

Enlightenment (bodhi, satori) is awakening to the truth of existence—seeing through the illusion of separateness. In many Buddhist teachings, it means recognizing the relative and the absolute: in the absolute sense, all beings are already whole and connected; in the relative, they suffer and strive. Enlightenment is not an escape from life, but a deeper engagement with life, unclouded by delusion. It is being fully present, aware, and compassionate—especially within relationships.

---

On Desire, Sex, and Ethical Intimacy

Contemporary Zen teachers like Jundo Cohen address lay practitioners with grounded, often humorous honesty. In the Japanese Zen tradition, which does not follow the monastic Vinaya code, celibacy is respected but not required—even for clergy. For lay people, the precept is not to abstain from sex, but to “not misuse sexuality.”

The core moral message is this: be honest, be mindful, be moderate. Sex is not inherently harmful. Harm arises through obsession, coercion, addiction, dishonesty, or disrespect. Thus, to engage in sex ethically—whether solo, partnered, short-term, or long-term—one must remain aware of impact, intention, and consent.

Zen teaches that even desire, approached wisely, can be part of the path. But unchecked desire—whether for power, pleasure, or validation—leads to suffering. Moderation, presence, and responsibility are the compass. Even masturbation, Cohen suggests with characteristic wit, is not sinful—but should be practiced with self-awareness, balance, and respect for others and oneself.

---

Enlightenment in Relationship

The Eastern path teaches that the way we engage with others is itself a form of practice. Relationships—romantic, familial, communal—are not separate from the spiritual journey; they are the journey. In loving others, we see our own face more clearly. In conflict, we confront our illusions. In letting go, we find freedom. In embracing compassion, we find awakening.

To be enlightened in relationship is not to be perfect—it is to be aware, to respond with clarity, and to love without clinging. As the statue of Samantabhadra and his consort Samantabhadri reminds us in Tibetan Buddhism, the union of wisdom and skillful means is the very heart of awakening. In every connection, there is the potential for liberation.

Buddhist Tradition and Sexual Desire

Early Buddhism and Nikaya Buddhism (“scriptural” Buddhism, especially Theravada) based their philosophies on the oral and later written tradition of the sayings of Siddhartha Gotama Buddha. The Buddha, who lived sometime around the fifth century BCE, claimed to have awakened to the reality of existence. Renouncing the luxurious life of a wealthy tribal ruler, Siddhartha left home to become a mendicant monk, and taught that the world of impermanence should be left behind in favor of mental and spiritual liberation from attachments.

Later Mahayana Buddhism, beginning in the first century BCE and greatly developed in China after the fourth century CE, changed focus from the Shakyamuni’s renunciation of the world and ending the cycle of rebirth. The Mahayana Buddhist follows the way of the bodhisattva, not renouncing human affairs, but finding liberation within the cycle of existence. The bodhisattva seeks enlightenment (bodhi) and full Buddhahood for himself and all beings, but puts off the attainment of complete liberation, to remain in the cycle of existence for the benefit of all living beings. 

The Mahayana Buddhist regards the way of the bodhisattva as the only compassionate stance, which is considered to be true Buddhism, where seeking liberation only for oneself is viewed as selfish. This way of life embraces both the human condition and the path of liberation. On a practical level, this means that the Mahayana Buddhist undergoes a modified form of training slightly different from the Nikaya, permitting a more moderate lifestyle, uniting the mundane with the transcendental. 

Just as the wisdom teachings of the Nikaya and Mahayana traditions differ noticeably, so do their respective moral disciplines and types of meditation, as well. For example, where Nikaya monastics renounce all worldly entrapments, various denominations of Mahayana clergy are allowed to marry. 

As for meditation, the dual system of Tranquility (Samatha) and Insight (Vipassana) and the gradational meditations (jhanas) of the Nikayas as described by Buddha, are greatly expanded upon in Vajrayana practice and reduced in Soto Zen practice to the single practice-realization of shikantaza, “nothing but just sitting.” 

The Buddhists scriptures, known in the original Pali as suttas (Sanskrit sutras), are contained within the Tipiṭaka (Sanskrit Tripiṭaka), or “Three Baskets,” compiled from about the sixth up through the first century BCE. The Mahayana tradition includes the Tripiṭaka in its sacred literature, but also includes other sutras written during the first millenium CE.

Nikaya philosophy and practice follow the Tipitaka, but Mahayana often diverges from Shakyamuni’s more superficial teachings, claiming to follow the essence of Buddhism as taught by the Buddha rather than the founder’s specific instructions for his fifth century BCE Indian monks. Both systems are explained below and both follow basic Buddhist philosophy except where noted otherwise.

The Origins of Desire

The Buddha described insight into the process of causes and conditions that governs the universe following set laws. He called this the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination, which explains how craving arises from ignorance. It is insight that dominates ignorance and illumines the path to liberation from the attachment to desire, as well as the illusions of self and of phenomenon; and subsequent mental suffering. 

1. Ignorance
2. Compounding Factors
3. Consciousness
4. Name and Form
5. Six Senses
6. Contact
7. Feeling
8. Craving
9. Grasping
10. Existence
11. Birth
12. Aging and Death

Buddhism traces the origin of desire to a list of the operative parts and in the cycle of cause and effect leading from existence to attachment to desire. 

This mechanism of desire consists of: ignorance, compounded factors, consciousness, name and form, the six sense spheres, contact, feeling, craving, grasping, existence, birth, aging and death. These parts cannot be listed in order of cause and effect, as the list includes both objects and actions, but it can be explained. Existence leads to birth, aging and death. The life between birth and death is lived through a material body and a mind born in ignorance and subject to compounded factors. 

The organs of the senses are the bridge between body and mind. The mind includes consciousness, thought and feeling, which are all affected when an object makes contact with a sense organ. Pleasurable contact involves craving for more and painful contact involves craving for avoidance. Such craving leads to grasping for what is craved. This grasping is then, according to the ancient Buddhist theory, a form of karma, or intentional action, that determines one’s merit, the measure by which one is reborn into existence after death within a spectrum of good to evil realms. 

Generally, as the Samyutta Nikaya repeatedly asserts (22:56; III 58-61), the Noble Eightfold Path is the means to establish the cessation of contact and subsequent cessation of clinging, craving and lust. The ultimate cause of desire and mental suffering lies with attachment to the Five Aggregates (khandha). The term khandha is commonly translated “aggregate.” The Five Aggregates are discussed in the Pali Khandha Samyutta or Chinese Yin Xiangying (“Connected with Aggregates”) in the Samyuktagama. 

In Samyuktagama 55 Buddha says that any form, feeling, perception, activity, or consciousness that gives rise to sensual desire, anger, ignorance, or various other distressing mental phenomena, are simply the aggregates with attachment. The Five Aggregates are:

1. The aggregate of material form (the four elements: earth, air, fire, water)

2. The aggregate of feeling (contact of the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind; pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral)

3. The aggregate of perception (forms, sounds, odors, tastes, tangibles, mental objects)

4. The aggregate of activities (volition born of each of the six feelings)

5. The aggregate of consciousness (eye consciousness, ear consciousness, and so forth for the six feelings; consciousness is what distinguishes between all phenomena, i.e., becomes conscious of each distinct thing, giving them name and form)

When one consistently engages in meditation (samadhi), intense concentration, one will come from ignorance and delusion to understand the unending arising and cessation of the Five Aggregates. One will come to the insight that all is impermanent and the true nature of perceived phenomena, including the self, is emptiness. 

One will also realize that the underlying essence of existence is dissatisfaction or suffering (duhkha), which manifests as longing, anger, rage, fear, worry, confusion, pain, depression, lamentation, grief and despair. These insights motivate one to abandon attachment, abandon desire and craving, and thereby mental suffering is abandoned, returning to the unconditioned state of Nibbana (Sanskrit nirvana). In this state the Five Aggregates are said to neither exist nor not exist. This method of cessation and liberation is known as Right View and the Middle Way.

In the Buddhist tradition, craving sexual pleasure is a main source of dissatisfaction and mental pain. When the desire is satisfied, the person is blissful, but when the pleasure diminishes, the person experiences pain and misery. Buddha’s theory was that by willfully letting go of desires, one could transcend one’s subsequent mental suffering. 

Transcending desire is most effective when desires, themselves, are reduced. Recognizing this over the centuries, Buddhism has approached the problem of craving from several key angles. It is proper to examine what techniques are suggested to let go of desires, how far this is possible, and how successful are these techniques.

Buddhist Regulation of Desire

There are four traditional ways to regulate desire. The first, fear or deterrence, may linger in the background of our lives due to moral considerations, social mores, sexually transmitted diseases, and the importance of family planning. Forcibly controlling desire is able to limit desire, but not overcome it. Sublimation of desire in daily activities can help attenuate desire by channeling it into more productive outlets. Our final attempt at escaping desire requires a state of mind produced by meditation, distinguished by tranquility and equanimity, which we may refer to as transcendence of desire. 

1. Insight

Insight into the reality of desire is essential to laying the foundation for moral discipline in regards to sexuality. Such insight allows one to cultivate a healthy fear or repulsion to tame desire, such as fear of social consternation, fear of pregnancy, fear of disease, and fear of future karmic punishment. An effective technique along these lines is to contemplate the dangers and pitfalls of sensual desire so as to fuel an aversion to desire and motivate one to follow Buddhist morality and ethics.

2. Repression or Suppression

Second, some may avoid facing their sexuality through repression. This is the forcible way of denying desires with concentration or distraction. Suppression is essentially the same thing, but whereas repression means forcibly holding back desire, suppression implies forcibly stopping it altogether.

3. Sublimation

Desires may be sublimated through other outlets for energy, from ritual to exercise, to household chores, to hobbies. Sublimation helps as a form of distraction, but it also redirects energy from sexual desire into more productive activities.

4. Transcendence

The technique to let go of desires is known as letting go of attachment to desires. The desires still arise, for the cause of desire is a permanent aspect of human physiology and psychology, but the goal is to “detach” from all desires. 

Insight: the Reality of Desire

In the Majjhima Nikāya 75 Buddha explains how he grew up with three mansions, his father attempting to keep him attached to the secular life, surrounded by female musicians and servants to tend to his every need and desire. He recounts how he renounced his position and privileges along with cravings, and asserts that he witnesses others with wealth and women, consumed by desires and worries, and he does not envy them. They lust, crave and burn for sensual pleasures, while Buddha has found inner peace.

The Buddha compares those who indulge in lust and sensual pleasures with a leper who is covered in sores, who scratches his wounds and cauterizes them with fire. The leper derives some kind of satisfaction by scratching and burning himself, and is deluded into believing he is getting relief, while in reality scratching and burning are causing pain. Because his faculties are impaired, the leper has a mistaken perception of the painful as pleasant; just as he who indulges in sensual pleasures is deluded by imapired faculties into the mistaken perception that sensual pleasures are pleasant and not painful.

In the Potaliya Sutta (MN 54) Buddha compares sensuality with a bone smeared in blood and thrown to a hungry dog. He asks if the dog would be satisfied by such a bone, to which the answer is no, the dog would receive no sustenance from the bone, just as humans derive no sustenance or satisfaction from chasing sensuality. Sensuality is the source of stress, despair and many drawbacks. Equanimity can only be found in the unity of nirvana. 

Sensuality is then compared with a lump of flesh taken by a vulture, who is chased and attacked by other vultures vying for the meat. Buddha compares following sensuality with running into the wind with a grass torch, burning oneself badly, a source of pain and death. Falling into sensuality is like being dragged into a deep pit of glowing embers. Sensuality is like a pleasant dream of paradise, which vanishes when one awakens. Living in sensuality is like borrowing goods that make one appear wealthy, and then having them repossessed, causing one anguish. 

In the Maha-dukkhakkhandha Sutta (The Great Mass of Stress), the Buddha describes the allure of sensuality as the five strings of sensuality: forms known via the eye, sounds known via the ear, aromas known via the nose, tastes known via the tongue and sensations known via the body, which are pleasing, enticing and fostering of desire. 

He reminds his listeners that a young, beautiful maiden, the perfect example of the allure of forms, will age and die, becoming undesirable, even grotesque, as the pleasure and joy she evokes are dependent on her impermanent beauty and charm. The Buddha then contrasts feelings for impermanent things with the equanimity of meditation. He suggests that one should become liberated from desire for feelings by doing meditation. 

Thus, first, one should occasionally spend time pondering the risks and problems involved in sexual desire and gratification. It will be evident that sexual activity must be regulated if only for reasons of safety and quality of life. Cultivating this kind of aversion to desire is part of the Right Understanding of the Noble Eightfold Path. While one is consumed by desire, one cannot find tranquility, equanimity, concentration or wisdom. The very basis of Buddhist teaching is the overcoming of ignorance, desire and aversion. 

Mahayana Buddhism and Chan/Zen in particular recognize the paradox in the Buddhist aversion to natural ignorance, desire and aversion, with a strong desire and striving after the equanimity of enlightenment and wisdom. Therefore, the Mahayana Buddhist cultivates the path of the bodhisattva, who realizes nirvana while still within the world of impermanence, even refusing full liberation until all beings are liberated, in other words, never. The Mahayana Buddhist views the cycle of existence and liberation, the relative and the absolute, as a single unitary reality beyond all duality.

Suppression

Returning to the regulation of desire in Early Buddhism and Nikaya Buddhism, there are three further techniques besides contemplation of the dangers and pitfalls of sensual desire. First, one overcomes desires as Buddha overcame Mara’s daughters: through forced suppression of desires as they arise. This entails a great effort to resist the temptation of the desire; to not indulge in thoughts or actions that perpetuate or fulfill the desire. 

Buddhist method begins by repressing desire by forcibly turning one’s thoughts away from desire and onto contemplation of renunciation, loving-kindness and compassion, or just turning inward, quieting the mind and concentrating one’s mind single-pointedly in meditation [19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta (Two Kinds of Thought)]. The Vitakkasanthana Sutta (The Removal of Distracting Thoughts) offers a system of five techniques to address distracting thoughts, desires and aversions as a remedy to use periodically when needed.

When one experiences unwholesome thoughts, one is counselled to first try some standard remedial meditations. For sensual desire, the meditation is on the ugliness of the human anatomy both living and dead, aging and decomposing (its tissues, organs, secretions and excretions, as described in the Satipatthana Sutta and Visuddhimagga). 

Against desires for inanimate objects, the meditation is on impermanence. To contradict ill-will toward living beings, the meditation is on loving-kindness. When there is ill-will toward inanimate objects, the meditation is on the natural elements. For delusion arising in the mind, the remedy is meditation on the Dharma, on one’s teacher and their teachings, and personal inquiry into causes.

If the first remedial meditation fails to subdue the distracting thoughts, then one is advised to examine the danger of these thoughts, how they are delusion, unwholesome, and the cause of suffering. If this technique should also fail, then one should willfully forget the distracting thoughts, directing attention elsewhere by steadying and concentrating the mind. If the thoughts still continue, one should direct attention to seeking the cause of those thoughts, and the cause of the cause, and so on, until one understands the root cause of these distracting thoughts and can abandon them. 

Finally, if none of these techniques works, one must try to forget those thoughts by clenching the teeth, pressing the tongue against the roof of the mouth, constraining, beating down and crushing the mind with the mind to quiet, steady, and concentrate the mind. One who masters these techniques is known as a master of the course of thought, and is said to have severed craving, liberated oneself from fetters, and made an end of suffering.

Sublimation and Transcendence

Described above were techniques to forcibly subdue desire, to be utilized after one has contemplated the risks and problems of sensual desire and gratification. We now return to the other methods of overcoming desire. Thus, along with contemplation of dangers and pitfalls of sexual desire, and forced suppression of desires, one then sublimates the sex impulse into other creative outlets. 

These include the meditative absorptions known as the jhánas, religious devotion, labor, research, literature, music, art and physical exercise. Outside of religious ritual and meditation, Buddhists have traditionally enjoyed pastimes such as exercise, cooking, gardening, flower arranging, and the tea ceremony.

In the Buddha’s final days on earth, he taught the monks to contemplate the body with mindfulness, putting away all desires and worries about the world, feelings, the mind and objects of mind [16 Mahaparinibbana Sutta (The Great Passing): The Buddha’s Last Days 2.26)]. 

The Buddha claimed that the end of stress was a mental realm where there was neither earth, air, fire or water, infinite space, infinite consciousness, nothingness, perceived subjective reality or unperceived objective reality, or any other mental object, in other words, the mind empty of all objects of mind [Nibbana Sutta, Udana 8:1 Unbinding (1)]. The ideal is a monk who is sitting quietly and at peace, without the bonds of desire [Sariputta Sutta, Sariputta 4:10], experiencing a “pleasure not of the flesh” [Theragāthā 1:85: Sunāga].

Nikaya and Mahayana Buddhist methods are alike in function, but differ in form. For example, in Soto Zen shikantaza, one allows one’s emotions to play out naturally, in harmony with one’s cultivated moral discipline, but one is not attached to these emotions.

For some, emotions may grow less intense, for others, there may always be strong emotions. No one is perfect. This is the function of vow and repentance; the consistent discipline of focusing intentions through times of peace and times of disorder. This is living with nirvana in the midst of samsara: awakening within the realm of illusion.

The state of shikantaza is ultimately the correct attitude, but one may require specific concentration exercises to transcend the cravings of the sexual impulse. The meditations of Samatha (Calm or Tranquility) and Vipassana (Insight) are useful in this function, calming the mind and opening to insight of reality. Although one is using force to transcend desire, one uses it gently and mindfully, so the desires dissipate on their own. 

The Manorathapurani (Anguttara Nikaya Commentary) explains that samatha suppresses the five hindrances, including sensual lust. Samatha practiced with vipassana implies the elimination of even the tendency to sensual lust, which leads ultimately to the letting go of all attachment in the liberation of wisdom of arahantship. 

According to Early Buddhism and Nikaya, the Buddhist goes through four stages of enlightenment, from the Stream-enterer, who overcomes doubt, to the Once-returner, who subdues sensual desire and ill-will, to the Non-returner, who overcomes sensual desire and ill-will, to the Arahant, who is free from all attachment and ignorance of the Dharma. The Four Establishments of Mindfulness describe a detailed process of concentration along this path.

The Four Establishments of Mindfulness

The four establishments of mindfulness in the Satipatthana Sutta are collectively considered to describe the path from sorrow and pain to the realization of nirvana. These are the contemplation of the body, the feelings, the mind and phenomena.

Contemplation of the body begins with mindfulness of breathing, a simple awareness of the length of the breath, and then awareness of the whole body as it breathes, and finally a conscious calming of the body as it breathes. One becomes mindful of the four postures: walking, standing, sitting and lying down.

Being mindful of the body continues with every activity throughout the day. The sutta further suggests a body scan, visualizing every tissue of the body as disgusting, as mentioned above. In addition, the body is considered as a conglomeration of the four natural elements: earth, water, fire and air.

Finally, one visualizes the body in the stages of decomposition after death. The second establishment of mindfulness is contemplation of feeling, which is mindfulness of any pleasant feeling, painful feeling, or neutral feeling. One recognizes the difference between carnal and spiritual feelings. 

The third establishment of mindfulness is contemplation of mind, which means recognizing a mind that is experiencing lust, or a mind experiencing hatred, or a mind in delusion. Likewise, one is mindful of contraction, distraction, exultation, awakening, concentration and liberation. The fourth establishment of mindfulness is the contemplation of subjective and objective phenomena. 

This entails mindfulness of the five hindrances as they arise and vanish, i.e., sensual desire, ill-will, drowsiness, restlessness and doubt. Then phenomena is contemplated in terms of the Five Aggregates: physical form, feeling, perception (with thoughts and imagination), volition, and consciousness. 

Next in the contemplation of phenomena, the six sense organs and their senses are visualized; the eye and form, the ear and sounds, the nose and odors, the tongue and flavors, the body and tactile feelings, the mind and its ideas of phenomena. The seven enlightenment factors are then considered: mindfulness, discrimination of phenomena, energy, rapture, tranquility, concentration and equanimity. 

Finally, phenomena is contemplated in terms of the Four Noble Truths, the realization of which is the culmination of the path to liberation: suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering and the path leading from suffering to the cessation of suffering. The four establishments of mindfulness should be compared with the twelve-fold chain of dependent origination described above.

Celibacy and Moderation

Nikaya monks are required to be celebate and instructed to use their strength to resist desire by stopping lustful thoughts and just bearing through every episode of lust and desire. Lay people are vowed to regulate their sexual behavior rather than indulge in every desire. Celibacy is not a natural state of being for most human beings, it is for only a small section of the species, and this is due to special physiological factors probably based on genetics, but perhaps sometimes due to nurture or unique life experience. 

In any case, it is not to be expected that the majority attempt voluntary celibacy, nor is it advisable to limit eligibility for priesthood to those suited to celibacy. Zen Buddhist priests forego Buddha’s policy of monastic abstinence and practice moderation just as traditional lay followers. In America the difference between monastic and lay follower is very slim, resting mainly on leadership roles, paraphernalia, ritual, and scholarly training.

Some people are by nature asexual. These have a great advantage over all others in the Buddha Way. Siddhartha became asexual when he said he had conquered lust and craving. But it is not possible to change one’s sexuality, this is a genetic condition one is born with, so those who are not asexual can only guess at what pure asexuality must be like, they must live with their sexuality, with lust, with craving. They may wish they were asexual, they may judge asexuality as superior to sexuality, as it is a ceasing of fleshly worldly craving, but they must find acceptance and peace with their own necessary condition, and be a buddha within this human condition.

The Buddha taught that those who consider the precepts and practices, and especially celibacy, to be the fundamental meaning of service are at one extreme. Those who find no harm in sensual desires are at the other extreme. Both extremes lead to delusion and death, and the middle way is the path of the Buddhist [Udana 6.8: Ganika Sutta, “The Courtesan”]. Dogen Zenji, the founder of Soto Zen Buddhism, in his final sermon (Shobogenzo, “The Eight Truths of a Great Human Being”), admonishes that one must just cease chasing widely after desires and live moderately with small desires. 

Western Morality and Relationship Worldviews

If Eastern thought emphasizes balance, interdependence, and enlightened compassion, Western traditions have historically emphasized duty, character, and divine or rational order. The Western worldview has evolved through a long dialogue between religious doctrine, classical philosophy, political theory, and scientific rationalism. Within this framework, relationships have often been understood through the lens of moral obligation, covenant, civility, and law.

Foundations in Ancient Religion and Myth

The earliest Western codes of behavior emerged from the mythic-religious traditions of the ancient world. In Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and Persian societies, morality was seen as a divine mandate or a cosmic duty, often codified in sacred texts or epic tales.

• In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi laid down explicit rules for social conduct, many of which governed family, marriage, and property relationships.
  
• In ancient Egypt, Ma’at represented the principle of harmony, truth, and justice—regulating human conduct and cosmic order alike.
  
• The Greco-Roman world, through philosophers like Socrates, Plato, and Cicero, began to frame moral character in terms of virtue, reason, and civic responsibility.
  
• Persian Zoroastrianism offered a dualistic moral cosmos where truth (asha) battled falsehood (druj), emphasizing moral choice as a cosmic struggle.
  
• The Abrahamic religions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—introduced a powerful framework of divine command ethics, emphasizing obedience, sexual discipline, covenant, charity, and righteousness in personal and communal relationships.
  

In these traditions, morality was not only about the self—it was relational: defined in terms of duty to God, family, tribe, ruler, and society.

---

The Civilizing Influence of Manners and Morality

As societies grew more complex, so did expectations for behavior in daily interactions. The concept of rudeness and politeness developed not just as etiquette but as a form of moral signaling. To behave with decorum, modesty, and restraint came to be associated with self-discipline, nobility, and social order.

• The Gentleman Ideal, especially in British culture, reflects this deeply. In The English Gentleman (Philip Mason), the ideal male was not only polite and restrained but morally upright, courageous, and rational—a protector of virtue and civility.
  
• Chivalry, in the medieval West, codified the behavior of knights through values such as loyalty, honor, mercy, and respect toward women and the weak. Though often romanticized, it reflected an early attempt to integrate ethics into martial and feudal relationships.
  
• Etiquette, refined over centuries, became formalized in the modern era through figures like Emily Post, who taught that good manners were not just social polish but an expression of consideration, empathy, and public morality.
  

These codes helped regulate not only courtship and friendship but also professional, civic, and intercultural relationships.

---

Conflict, Defense, and the Moral Character

Western traditions place strong emphasis on moral character—a concept linking virtue to action and identity. The capacity for self-defense, the willingness to uphold honor, and the moral imperative to resist tyranny or injustice have often been glorified in Western thought.

This moral character was seen not only in individuals, but in institutions and nations. Personal virtues such as integrity, courage, and fidelity were mirrored in political ideals like justice, liberty, and the rule of law. In relationships—whether familial, romantic, or political—these ideals fostered expectations of loyalty, commitment, and principled behavior.

---

Morality from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment

The Middle Ages saw morality entwined with Christian doctrine. Sexuality was regulated under ideals of chastity and sacramental marriage; power dynamics in relationships (such as husband-wife, lord-serf, clergy-laity) were interpreted hierarchically through theology.

The Renaissance brought humanistic revival, where classical ideas of virtue and civic life were reborn, and love—especially romantic love—began to be celebrated as ennobling rather than sinful.

The Enlightenment ushered in a rational critique of traditional morality. Thinkers like Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hume redefined ethics in terms of reason, natural rights, social contracts, and universal human dignity. Relationships were reimagined as voluntary, rational, and reciprocal.

---

Freemasonry: Symbolic Morality and Brotherhood

Among the most enduring expressions of Enlightenment-era moral philosophy is Freemasonry—a fraternal tradition that uses symbol and allegory to teach ethical and spiritual lessons. Masons do not enforce doctrinal belief but offer a framework for moral self-improvement through ritual, symbolism, and shared values.

• Freemasonry promotes liberty, equality, fraternity, and the development of character through self-knowledge and mutual respect.
  
• Its moral teachings are encoded in architectural metaphors—the Square, the Compass, the Temple—and organized through three degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master Mason), corresponding symbolically to the three stages of life: youth, manhood, and age.
  
• Freemasonry encourages contemplation of one’s duties to family, society, and humanity. Its rituals often speak of building a “temple within,” where virtue is laid stone by stone.
  

See also:
Freemasonry’s Timeless Wisdom – The Square Magazine
Cardinal Virtues in Freemasonry – The Square Magazine

Freemasonry is unique in Western moral development in that it fuses Enlightenment rationality with ancient symbolic tradition, offering a relational ethics grounded in universal brotherhood and civic virtue.

---

The Scientific Revolution and Modern Morality

The Scientific Revolution and the subsequent rise of secular humanism began to shift the foundation of Western morality from religious authority to evidence-based reasoning and empirical ethics. Modern relationship ethics increasingly draw from psychology, sociology, and biology, rather than divine command.

• Human rights replaced divine right.
  
• Consent replaced duty.
  
• Emotional intelligence replaced stoic detachment.
  
• Diversity and inclusion began to challenge older patriarchal and heteronormative frameworks.
  

Today, Western moral discourse continues to evolve. Civil liberties, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and informed consent have redefined what ethical romantic and social relationships mean in the West.

Yet the roots of Western moral thought—virtue, character, dialogue, and reason—continue to shape our expectations in relationships: to be honest, loyal, just, respectful, and free.

---

Would you like a visual chart comparing Eastern and Western views of relationship morality? Or shall we proceed to the next section of your article?

Modern Science and Sexual Desire

First, let us define our terms. Desire is a feeling of wishing or wanting for an object or event. Sex is a physical activity based on the function of the reproductive system, that is, procreation: it does not need to be undertaken for the purpose of reproduction, as it may be performed for recreation, utility (such as in prostitution), or as a manifestation of an ethical breach or mental health disorder (as in molestation or rape.) It does not necessarily involve sexual intercourse. 

Lust is sexual desire, a feeling of wishing or wanting a sexual object or event. Attraction is the feeling of finding interest, liking, or desiring something. This does not have to be sexual, as people are attracted to many things for various reasons. Sexual attraction is attraction based on sexual desire, or lust.

Healthy adult human beings normally feel desire, lust and love, which are emotions caused by the organic impulse to procreate. One of the defining characteristics of life is the function of reproduction and its manifestation in the reproductive system. The key to animal anatomy and physiology is genetics, whereby organisms are produced through the biological process of procreation. 

Adult animals are normally driven by the reproduction system to seek and mate with the fittest of their own species, that they may produce offspring that will survive to breed another generation, and so on, ad infinitum. Asexuality is uncommon but it does occur and it is form of healthy sexual preference, like homosexuality or bisexuality.

Romantic and sexual behaviors are not entirely determined by biology, as they are largely formed by cultural expectations and other factors, but the ultimate origin of desire is to be found at the level of individual chemistry.

The drive to procreate is physical and subconscious. Lust is a chemical reaction caused by the physiology and psychology of the individual, and occurs even in the absence of any potential mate. A person does not choose to be attracted to someone; desire is basically a chemical reaction caused by the physiology and psychology of the individual.

Origins of Desire

The limbic region of the brain plays a central role in sexual desire. The amygdala is the part of the brain that processes appetitive and aversive stimuli and emotional arousal. When one experiences sexual desire, the amygdala initiates a sexual response in the hypothalamus.

Science has shown that looking at sexually stimulating images stimulates the amygdala and the hypothalamus. The limbic system in the brain, located on both sides of the thalamus and under the cerebrum, is the part of the body we must learn to control if we are to manage sexual desire.

The human sex drive is basically the product of estrogens and androgens, the female and male sex hormones. The endocrine system, the arrangement of glands that produce hormones, works in tandem with the nervous system, mainly the brain, to produce emotions. Hormones and neurotransmitters are the ultimate causes of sexual attraction. The pituitary gland in the brain controls a range of hormones, including testosterone, which is found in higher levels in men and women with stronger sex drives. 

When we are sexually attracted to someone, the hormones cortisol, adrenaline, and dopamine are released into our body, causing a strong feeling of pleasure that can act like an addiction. Oxytocin makes a person feel close to another person, building attachment when someone is falling in love. 

Oxytocin is released during cuddling and sex, and women get a large dose during orgasm, whereas men produce a rush of dopamine. When separated from one’s object of love, one produces less oxytocin and craves it, forming a kind of addiction to the love object. When in love, people, especially women, produce the chemicals norepinephrine and phenylethylamine, which both increase focus and feelings of euphoria, enhancing attention on a love partner and contributing to the addiction.

The Science of Attraction

Sexual desire is a complicated process that depends on emotional states, social mores and other contexts. Culture can have a huge impact on sexual desire and promiscuity. More particularly, desire is influenced by characteristics that are found to be attractive. Everybody has a different idea of what constitutes desirable traits.

The most common causes of attraction stem from the reproductive drive and its function of seeking a mate with traits which are desirable to pass on to the next generation. Namely, basic health, physical strength and beauty, intelligence, professional skills, sociability, lovingkindness, emotional intelligence, and other indicators of survival and the ability to thrive.

Individuals with more symmetrical faces are generally considered more attractive. Women tend to find men more attractive who are masculine in mind and body, whereas men tend to be attracted to feminine characteristics. Men usually look for a shorter woman and women usually prefer a taller and muscular man. 

Masculine characteristics include confidence, power, dominance, independence, leadership, courage, assertiveness, decisiveness, virility, and machismo. Feminine traits include passivity, gentleness, humility, sensitivity, nurturing, empathy, beauty, and sensuality. Preferences are extremely individualistic, as are how these traits are expressed in different people, both male and female, on a spectrum of gender.

Traditional gender roles are based on a long history of males hunting, warring and doing business, while women look after the home and children. These traditional roles still exist today but over the last few generations women have made great strides in entering the workforce and taking on leadership roles in traditional male careers, whereas more men are taking on a greater responsibility in the home and with the raising of children.

While biological factors remain as they have always been, and stereotypes persist, the world is seeing a variety in expressions of gender and sexuality on a greater scale than any other time in history.

Other aspects also play a part in attraction, from the environment around the interaction of a couple, the approval of friends and family, the sound of a potential mate’s voice, their scent, and so on. Clothes, makeup, jewelry and other accessories are often used according to cultural norms to boost sex appeal.

Once a person has the initial attention of a potential mate, many other factors are involved in stimulating desire, from social-economic status to style, to posture, to personality. The subject fills many volumes and will continue to produce more material as long as humans maintain an interest in the science of their own desires.

Romantic Relationships

Hormones can determine how much sexual desire we feel, what form attraction takes, and to whom we feel sexually attracted. Attraction can be categorized by three successive levels: lust, love and attachment. Lust is initiated by an attraction to a body (all aspects, including the face and hair). In the initial phase of lust, the perception or even thought of a sexual interest will cause the brain to activate the dopamine reward system, which relieves pain and induces feelings of pleasure. 

During the attachment phase, the levels of the hormones oxytocin and vasopressin are increased; promoting bonding and cooperation between mates who are genetically formed to become parents ready to raise mutual offspring. As well as encouraging sexual arousal, oxytocin is involved in the contraction of the woman’s uterus, stimulating birth, as well as initiating lactation. 

The hormone kisspeptin, produced in the hypothalamus of the brain, is getting more attention from scientists. Kisspeptin works in several functions of the reproductive system from puberty to pregnancy, regulating the gonadal steroids and helping to boost the sex drive in body and mind. 

An interesting study has shown that there are four basic personality types based on four hormones that deeply influence attraction. The four hormones and the traits of people in whom each is dominant are: 

Dopamine: Independent, enthusiastic, adventurous, risk-taking

Serotonin: Social, calmness, traditional, detail-oriented, structured, planners

Testosterone: Competitive, aggressive, direct, decisive, logical, emotionally reserved, rule-based

Estrogen: Introspective, intuitive, emotionally intelligent, creative

Individuals with dopamine or serotonin as dominant tend to be attracted to people with the same characteristic. Individuals with testosterone or estrogen as dominant tend to be attracted to their opposites.

Human relationships can cause complicated emotions and situations. Offspring often changes the lives of the parents, family and even the wider community. Religion and culture are rife with admonitions against promiscuity, sex outside of marriage, and even sexual desire. Certainly, family planning is necessary to the health of society. 

Hormones and the other physiological aspects of physical attraction can cloud judgment of reality. For these reasons, people have historically made many attempts to limit or stop sexual activity in themselves and others. Sexual desire cannot be forcibly stopped. It can be repressed, suppressed or indulged in.

Regulating Desire

There is a lot of advice out there about how to control sexual urges, some better than others, and not a whole lot of scientific evidence to back up many of the claims. The more practical, science-backed methods are usually pretty clearly common sense. While some people may not feel much need to reduce a low to average sex drive, sex and love addicts may struggle to reign in their passions and romantic behavior. Each individual may wish to test suggested methods by trial and error. Some methods include: 

Getting out of the environment you are in and taking a walk, contacting a friend to talk to or walk with you. Keep a to-do list handy that will keep you busy when you have unwanted feelings. Have a good book or puzzle or other distraction to keep your mind occupied. Set a schedule so that you can only masturbate or have sex at specific times as a way to postpone your pleasure and build resistance to desire. Make a list of all the risks and negative outcomes of desire and sexual activity that you can look at to motivate you to control your urges and behavior. 

Identify and avoid triggers. You may have to change your lifestyle or rearrange your schedule to keep yourself away from triggers to your desires. Avoid pornography; you can even put parental controls on your electronic devices or ask a partner to do it using a password you do not know. Abstain from masturbation completely if possible or for set periods of time. Stay away from parties and abstain from drugs and alcohol. Drugs and alcohol decrease your self-control and parties can be triggers for sexual desire and behavior.

Stress may be a factor in obsessive feelings, thoughts and behaviors. Learn how to relax with finding a work-life balance, letting go of worry, proven relaxation techniques, enjoyment of art, music and literature, gardening or other hobbies – knitting, sewing, drawing, painting, writing, building something, the list goes on.

Perhaps view less television and social media, go for walks, get out of the house and spend time in nature. Exercise. Dance, lift weights, run, do yoga or tai chi, go swimming, ride a bicycle. Learn mindfulness or another form of meditation that will allow you to transcend your urges to some degree. 

Sexual issues can arise even within a romantic relationship. Romantic relationships can be complicated and difficult. We all do our best to navigate this strange terrain. Research online for relationship advice, talk with a trusted friend or even your doctor, a therapist or support group, as sometimes talking to someone can help give perspective and make your situation clearer. Discuss any problems with your romantic partner. A healthy sex life needs attention just like other areas of health. 

Basic human motivations include the needs for warmth, food, shelter, safety, social intercourse, and sexual outlet. Sometimes these motivations may stimulate a person to overindulge or obsess in a basic need, such as overeating, stinginess or greed, violent defensive posturing, extreme extroverted behavior, and sexual addiction. 

A motivational conflict occurs when two motivations conflict in such a way as to prevent action, such as the need to focus on health and a career and the competing need for sexual gratification. Everyone has to moderate their motivations to some extent, and this requires self-control. According to psychologists, self-control involves three factors: standards, monitoring, and strength.

Standards are guidelines that we create to govern our behavior, and must be set consciously, determined by a knowledge of what is appropriate. Science helps us gather information about how to set standards that support our well-being. Consciousness also plays a central role in monitoring perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions. This is how we keep track of everything, such as our finances, exercise schedule or nutritional intake. Strength is the ability to forcibly control our feelings, thoughts and actions when they begin to manifest in a way that counters our standards.

Methods of Self-Control

Psychologists suggest that self-control can be improved with four methods. The mental energy required for the strength of self-control is limited. This energy must be regulated; sometimes it should be deployed, sometimes it must be conserved. One can observe oneself for a week and estimate how much mental energy one needs each day, then one can plan how much energy to use as self-control is needed throughout the day.

Working with a plan to develop self-control, the second method is to make a firm decision to do such-and-such at such-and-such time. This eliminates the indecision of whether or not to use self-control for specific tasks. If you need to study, set a specific time to study as early as possible. If you need to exercise, write down and adhere to an exact schedule. If sexual desire is the issue, then allow yourself to seek gratification on predetermined days of the week, or time of day, depending on your situation.

The next scientific method is to strengthen self-control by repeated exercises of self-control throughout the day. Psychologists say that just doing things with your non-dominant hand can help build your will-power. When you are motivated to do something to excess or put something off that should be done, make a conscious effort to strengthen your will-power by resisting the temptation or forcing yourself to complete the task at hand.

A more passive method to help your self-control is to simply control your environment. If you want to eat healthier, buy healthy groceries and keep junk food out of your residence. If sexual desire is your weakness, keep yourself away from pornography and parties where singles go to hook up. These methods coincide well with the methods discussed above. Science has also shown that mindfulness meditation, by reducing stress, anxiety and depression, while developing self-control and increasing awareness, is a useful method to transcend cravings as they are occuring.

A group of scientists at Utrecht University, led by Esther K. Papies, Ph.D., has discovered that a method they call “mindful attention” allows subjects to control sexual desire and an appetite for unhealthy food through transcending attention on the objects of craving.

Experiments showed that mindfulness lowered the perceived attractiveness of potential mates even with sexual motivation. Likewise, mindfulness was shown to lower the attractiveness of food, especially unhealthy food, even in a state of hunger. This is convincing evidence that mindfulness meditation allows the mind to transcend desires to a significant degree.

A Unified Buddhist and Scientific Treatment of Sexual Desire

As can be seen from the above, when we compare the Buddhist view of desire with the scientific view, the Buddhist view fits harmoniously with the scientific view. We can use the findings of scientific research such as that above to better follow the Buddhadharma. Then we can modify any Buddhist doctrine by the information derived from scientific method, and set forth a practice based upon a scientific Buddhist theory and practice. 

Where Buddhism provides a complete way of life in alignment with science, science offers insight into traditional Buddhist theories and practices. Buddhist methods of regulation are supported by the science and specific strategies are shown to produce concrete results. The Buddhist method of regulating desire focuses on the perceptions and thoughts that directly stimulate desire. This is best managed through mindful meditation, which is highly recommended by scientists who have studied the relationship between desire and meditation. 

We noted above the four methods of mastering desire and sexual activity, namely, fear of repercussions, repression and suppression, sublimation and transcendence. Scientific methods may be categorized under these headings so we may establish an organized front. 

First, we can list scientifically sound reasons to act so as to avoid real repercussions of unrestrained desire and irresponsible sexual behavior. While practical thinking would suggest the importance of moral, personal and social considerations on an individual’s sexual desire and behavior, science instructs caution so as to avoid sexually transmitted diseases, and suggests the vital role of family planning in the quality of life of family, community, nation and world.

We have seen that according to psychologists, self-control involves three factors: standards, monitoring, and strength. First, set your standards by writing down how often you feel is natural and healthy to engage in sexual activity. Monitor and regulate your activity according to that schedule. This is the first step to mastering your behavior. Keep a daily schedule and to-do list at hand. Make and return periodically to review a list of risks and negative outcomes of sexual desire and behavior. 

Control your environment to the extent that you surround yourself with something other than sexually stimulating input. Avoid clubs, parties, pornography and other triggers to sexual desire as much as possible. Drugs and alcohol weaken defenses, so it is best to avoid or limit consumption. You should also make a more active effort at self-control. As you experience sexual desire throughout the day, build your will-power to resist desire with small exercises of self-control, like using your non-dominant hand to do basic tasks. 

Distraction can help repress and suppress desires in the short-term. It is recommended to keep a book, puzzle, or other distraction available, and today that might mean a game or ebook on an electronic device.

Regular stress can influence one to find solace in sexual activity, and this is usually normal and healthy, but should it become excessive, one should take more deliberate measures to reduce stress. Taking a walk alone or with someone, chatting with a friend, exercising, dancing, listening to music, enjoying art, gardening, or a relaxing hobby, are all good ways to help suppress and sublimate desires. 

Finally, science and Buddhism are clear that the operative method of transcending desire that cannot be repressed, suppressed, or sublimated, is mindful meditation. This involves calm (samatha) and insight (vipassana) meditation, or Zazen, known in Soto Zen as shikantaza, or “just sitting,” or as it is known in the world of psychotherapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR).

In conclusion, it is hoped that although incomplete and brief, this short article should serve as a handy field guide to the moderation of desire for a secular or Buddhist lifestyle of health, quality and enjoyment. 

Global Society, Social Mores, Ethics, and Politics

In today’s interconnected world, personal relationships cannot be separated from the larger cultural, economic, and political systems that surround them. From the family to the nation-state, from local customs to international law, human relationships are embedded in global structures that both shape and are shaped by our daily interactions. Understanding relationships in the modern age requires not only insight into psychology and biology—but also into social mores, civic ethics, and geopolitical realities.

National Culture, Patriotism, and Immigration

Every society cultivates a distinct set of social mores—the informal rules of behavior that govern everything from courtship and politeness to authority and rebellion. These cultural patterns define what is considered moral, respectable, offensive, or desirable in relationships. In many cases, these values are tightly interwoven with national identity and patriotism, influencing the way people relate to their country, community, and neighbors.

At the same time, immigration and cultural exchange challenge fixed definitions of morality and relationship norms. As individuals cross borders—physically or virtually—they bring new practices, expectations, and relational frameworks. This can lead to tension, but also to growth: intercultural relationships force societies to examine their assumptions about family, gender roles, sexuality, authority, and belonging.

In the 21st century, cultural pluralism is not optional—it is reality. The ethical challenge is to cultivate a global civility: a shared framework that respects cultural diversity while promoting universal human dignity in relationships and rights.

Working-Class Norms, Middle-Class Aspirations, and Corporate Culture

Relationship norms are also shaped by economic class and professional identity. In many societies, working-class cultures prioritize loyalty, toughness, and familial bonds, while middle-class norms often emphasize individual achievement, emotional control, and strategic social mobility.

Corporate culture, in turn, imposes its own values on human interaction: productivity, professionalism, emotional regulation, and network-building. The workplace becomes a site where people learn to manage relationships under pressures of hierarchy, performance, and market logic. Office dynamics—mentorship, teamwork, competition, discrimination, sexual harassment policies—reflect the intersection of relationship psychology and institutional power.

These stratifications affect everything from dating norms and parenting styles to political affiliations and civic participation.

Education, Political Correctness, and Civic Dialogue

Education systems play a central role in teaching how to relate. Beyond academic content, schools model and enforce social behavior: cooperation, respect, authority dynamics, group belonging, and gender performance.

In recent decades, the rise of political correctness has redefined the moral boundaries of public discourse. While often criticized, political correctness—at its best—aims to cultivate empathy, inclusion, and ethical speech. It asks: How can language be used not only to express but to respect?

As civic debate becomes increasingly polarized, the ability to communicate respectfully across difference has become an urgent relational skill. Social media and digital communication further complicate this terrain, allowing both connection and cruelty at unprecedented scales. In this climate, relational ethics—empathy, listening, clarity, honesty—are not merely private virtues, but public necessities.

International Trade, Law, and Human Relationships

On the global stage, relationships between nations are shaped by economic interdependence, diplomatic protocol, and international law. Treaties, trade agreements, and transnational organizations are essentially structured relationships—with expectations, boundaries, benefits, and consequences.

When nations interact, they do so through representatives—human beings tasked with managing complex relational dynamics under enormous pressure. From summit meetings to humanitarian aid, these relationships reflect the same dynamics as personal ones: trust, betrayal, negotiation, shared goals, competing desires.

International law, like interpersonal ethics, seeks to protect dignity, resolve conflict, and balance self-interest with collective well-being. It is, in a sense, the moral infrastructure of the planetary relationship network.

The Reciprocal Flow: Personal Lives and Global Systems

Just as nations and institutions shape our relationships, our individual relationships shape the world. The values we cultivate in our families, communities, classrooms, and friendships ripple outward. When millions of people practice empathy, integrity, and fairness, society changes. When selfishness, cruelty, or alienation dominate personal life, political systems degrade.

Likewise, the systems around us—economic pressures, media narratives, political ideologies—form the soil in which our personal lives grow. They influence who we meet, how we speak, what we expect in love or work, and how we resolve conflict.

To navigate this complexity, individuals must become socially literate, ethically grounded, and politically aware—not only to improve personal relationships, but to contribute to a healthier society and world.

Communication: The Lifeline of All Relationships

At the center of all human connection lies one essential act: communication. Whether through words, gestures, silence, or symbols, communication is the process by which meaning is shared, needs are expressed, and bonds are formed. It is the infrastructure of relationships—the way love is offered, conflict is resolved, and community is built.

Healthy communication requires more than vocabulary. It demands listening, vulnerability, contextual awareness, and the courage to clarify. When communication breaks down, relationships fracture; when it flourishes, so do empathy, collaboration, and peace.

In a world more connected than ever before, communication is not just a skill—it is a moral imperative. For relationships to thrive, and for societies to flourish, we must learn to speak, listen, and relate with wisdom, compassion, and care.

Conclusion: The Art and Science of Connection

From the first cry of a newborn reaching out to a parent, to the final parting words of a lifelong friend, the human journey is a story of relationships. We are born into relationship, shaped by it, and—at our best—awakened by it. Love, family, friendship, work, citizenship, even the distant presence of strangers: each is a thread in the vast, evolving web of human connection.

The science of relationships reveals that connection is neither accidental nor merely emotional. It is biological, psychological, cultural, ethical, and political. Relationships are governed by hormones and attachment styles, but also by norms, roles, laws, and values. They are expressions of who we are, and catalysts for who we might become.

Across the world’s wisdom traditions—East and West—we find common principles: balance, compassion, responsibility, honesty, and the pursuit of a life that contributes to others’ well-being. From the Daoist flow of yin and yang, to the Masonic ideal of building character stone by stone, we are reminded that healthy relationships arise not from control or conformity, but from mutual growth and shared meaning.

In our modern, hyperconnected world, relationships extend beyond traditional boundaries. We interact with people across continents, cultures, and belief systems. We form digital communities, navigate shifting norms, and face new challenges of communication, inclusion, and identity. In this context, social skills are not mere niceties—they are survival tools, civic virtues, and the keys to peace and prosperity.

Crucially, relationships are reciprocal. Just as we influence those around us, so too are we shaped by the environments, institutions, and systems in which we live. To create a more compassionate, equitable, and intelligent world, we must not only improve our personal relationships, but also reform the social structures that define them.

To relate well is to live well. And to live well together—in harmony, in justice, in mutual respect—is the highest expression of our humanity.

Let this be our challenge and our calling:
To become more skillful in love,
More courageous in truth,
More generous in connection,
And more wise in the great, shared art of being human.