Stars, Symbols, and the Self: A Scientific Humanist View of Astrology and Divination

Introduction: Between the Known and the Mysterious

From the earliest records of civilization to the modern digital age, human beings have sought to understand their place in the universe. Across centuries and cultures, practices such as astrology and divination have offered symbolic maps of meaning—tools to interpret the invisible patterns believed to shape our destinies.

Whether through the casting of runes, the reading of stars, or the drawing of cards, these traditions endure. Despite the rise of scientific reasoning and technological progress, astrology columns fill newspapers, tarot readings populate social media, and horoscopes remain part of daily conversation for millions.

Why do such practices persist in an age defined by data, logic, and empiricism?

This article explores astrology and divination through the lens of scientific humanism—a worldview that values empirical knowledge, ethical reasoning, and human psychological depth. Rather than accepting these practices at face value or rejecting them with scorn, we seek a third path: one that critically examines their origins, evolution, psychological functions, and ethical implications. We aim to clarify where symbolic traditions end and scientific inquiry begins.

In doing so, we must acknowledge something essential: the human mind does not run on facts alone. In times of uncertainty, grief, transition, or longing, we reach not just for evidence, but for stories. We seek orientation. We look for signs—not always to know the future, but to find our way through the present.

Astrology and divination, in this light, are not simply pseudosciences; they are meaning-making strategies that reveal as much about the human psyche as they claim to reveal about the cosmos.

This article traces their history, dissects their methods, considers their psychological appeal, and reflects on their ethical use. Through a scientific humanist perspective, we aim to understand—not to ridicule or romanticize, but to recognize how symbolic systems continue to live alongside the scientific in the complexity of human experience.

Definitions and Forms: Mapping the Landscape of Divination

Human beings have long sought insight into the hidden patterns of life—those governing the self, nature, relationships, and fate. Across civilizations, symbolic systems have emerged to serve this desire, offering frameworks for interpreting the unknown.

While distinct in method and origin, astrology and divination both represent attempts to glean meaning from perceived signs, whether celestial, material, or psychological. A clear understanding of their forms is essential before exploring their historical roles and psychological functions.

Astrology

Astrology is the symbolic study of the positions and movements of celestial bodies—principally the sun, moon, planets, and stars—in relation to human affairs and natural phenomena.

Astrologers construct charts (horoscopes) based on the time and location of a person’s birth or the beginning of a specific event, interpreting these configurations to describe personality traits, potentialities, or broader archetypal patterns. While many forms of astrology involve forecasting, others focus on self-understanding or correlation with terrestrial cycles.

Divination

Divination is the attempt to gain insight into a question or situation through systematic methods that are believed to reveal hidden knowledge or future events. Unlike astrology’s focus on celestial configurations, divination employs a variety of tools and techniques, many of which are symbolically rich and culturally grounded. The underlying premise is that symbolic randomness can reflect meaningful truths—what Carl Jung called synchronicity.

Forms of Divination

1. Tarot

A form of symbolic card reading using a deck of 78 cards composed of the Major and Minor Arcana. Readers interpret the spread of cards drawn in response to a question, using archetypal imagery to explore internal dynamics or life situations.

2. I Ching (Yijing)

An ancient Chinese divinatory text also known as the Book of Changes. Users cast hexagrams—six-line figures formed by tossing coins or dividing yarrow stalks—and interpret the resulting configurations according to the traditional commentary. It reflects a worldview of change, polarity, and dynamic balance.

3. Rune Casting

A form of divination based on the runic alphabets of Germanic languages, especially the Elder Futhark. Practitioners draw symbols from a bag or scatter them on a surface and interpret their position, shape, and symbolism in response to a query.

4. Tea-Leaf Reading (Tasseography)

This method interprets the patterns formed by residual tea leaves left in a cup after drinking. Shapes and arrangements are symbolically read, often requiring intuition and cultural symbolism to decode.

5. Automatic Writing

A technique in which individuals write words or messages without conscious control, often claiming to channel subconscious material, spirits, or archetypal forces. It blurs the line between divination and psychological expression.

6. Water Scrying (Hydromancy)

A form of reflective divination involving gazing into a bowl of water to perceive images, symbols, or visions. Like crystal gazing, it is valued more for inducing a meditative or altered state than for the objectivity of its results.


Each of these forms offers a window into symbolic interpretation, often evoking a sense of the sacred, the intuitive, or the unseen. While lacking empirical validation, they continue to hold psychological, cultural, and sometimes spiritual meaning for their practitioners. Their persistence across time and culture reflects something essential in the human quest—not merely for prediction, but for orientation in an uncertain world.


The History of Astrology and Divination

The origins of astrology and divination are among the oldest expressions of the human desire to understand and relate to the cosmos. Both practices emerged from early efforts to interpret the environment symbolically, drawing links between visible patterns and invisible forces. Their historical development reflects broader shifts in religious, philosophical, and scientific paradigms.

2.1 The History of Astrology

Astrology developed as an observational science long before it was a mystical one. The earliest known records of astrological practice date back to ancient Mesopotamia, where Babylonian priests meticulously charted the movements of celestial bodies as early as the 2nd millennium BCE. These records were not simply astronomical; they formed the basis of omen literature, connecting planetary positions with royal fates, military outcomes, and natural disasters.

By the time of the Hellenistic world (circa 3rd century BCE), astrology had evolved into a more complex system with philosophical underpinnings. Greek thinkers such as Ptolemy formalized horoscopic astrology, introducing the natal chart as a tool for analyzing a person’s character and fate based on the precise moment of birth. The zodiac, planetary rulerships, aspects, and houses became standardized elements of this model.

Astrology thrived in the Islamic Golden Age (8th–13th centuries), where scholars translated and expanded upon Greek texts, integrating them with Persian, Indian, and Arabic traditions. Figures like Al-Kindi and Albumasar applied astrological principles to medicine, weather, and political affairs.

During the European Middle Ages and Renaissance, astrology was studied alongside astronomy, medicine, and philosophy. Universities taught astrology as part of the quadrivium, and figures such as Johannes Kepler and Tycho Brahe—now recognized as founders of modern astronomy—practiced astrology as part of their work.

The Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution brought a sharp decline in astrology’s intellectual credibility. As Newtonian physics and empirical science reshaped understandings of causality, astrology was increasingly seen as pre-scientific. Yet despite its exclusion from academic institutions, astrology remained culturally persistent and saw a revival in the 20th century, particularly in psychological and spiritual contexts.

2.2 The History of Divination

Divination predates astrology in some forms and has roots in nearly every ancient civilization. In early agrarian societies, where survival was bound to natural cycles and unpredictable forces, people sought signs in everything from animal behavior to celestial events. Divination was often an official function of priesthoods and oracles, integrated with religious rites.

In ancient China, the I Ching emerged from practices involving oracle bones—heated and cracked tortoise shells—used to determine divine will. In Greece, oracles such as those at Delphi interpreted cryptic messages from the gods through trance states and symbolic utterances. In Rome, augurs interpreted the flight patterns of birds or the entrails of sacrificed animals to guide public decisions.

In African, Indigenous American, and Oceanic cultures, divination methods ranged from cowrie-shell casting to dream interpretation, often performed by shamans or spiritual specialists. These practices were not only predictive but deeply embedded in cosmology, social ethics, and communal identity.

The medieval and early modern West saw a fusion of folk divination with Christian mysticism, Hermeticism, and later, ceremonial magic. Divination methods like tarot, geomancy, and scrying were adapted by esoteric orders such as the Rosicrucians and the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.

In the modern era, divination has largely moved from communal ritual into private spiritual or psychological practice. It is now often used less for literal prediction and more for introspective exploration, personal decision-making, and the search for meaning.


From ancient temples to contemporary therapy rooms, both astrology and divination reflect enduring human attempts to understand the self and the world through symbolic pattern recognition. Their long and varied histories do not confer scientific legitimacy, but they do attest to their cultural resonance and psychological power.

Divination and Magic: A Symbolic Relationship

Throughout history, divination has often been interwoven with the broader tapestry of magical practice. While magic and divination can be conceptually distinguished—magic aims to influence events, whereas divination seeks to reveal hidden information—they share a symbolic worldview that sees the cosmos as interconnected, meaningful, and responsive to human intention.

3.1 Shared Worldview: Symbolism, Resonance, and Correspondence

Both magic and divination operate under the logic of symbolic causality rather than empirical causation. Where science seeks to explain how one thing physically causes another through measurable mechanisms, magical and divinatory traditions assert that events correspond to each other in meaningful, often archetypal ways. This is the ancient principle of correspondence: “as above, so below,” as stated in Hermetic philosophy.

For example, a tarot reading does not “cause” an event to occur; instead, it is believed to symbolically reveal an underlying pattern or resonance already present. Similarly, in magical practice, an object charged with intention may be used to align internal and external realities, not through force, but through symbolic affinity.

3.2 Ritual Context and Sacred Space

Divination frequently occurs within ritualized contexts. The setting is purified, sacred objects are arranged, and the practitioner enters a focused or altered state of consciousness. This mirrors the structure of magical ritual, where ceremonial elements are designed to shift awareness and facilitate communion with archetypal forces, deities, or spiritual energies.

In both divination and magic, the practitioner becomes a mediator between visible and invisible realms. The tools—whether cards, runes, astrological charts, or crystal balls—serve as symbolic gateways to knowledge that is believed to transcend ordinary perception.

3.3 Historical Entwinement of Magic and Divination

Historically, astrologers were also magicians, alchemists, or priests. In Renaissance Europe, magic, astrology, and alchemy were often practiced together within a philosophical framework that sought to harmonize the microcosm (human life) and the macrocosm (the universe).

In traditional African religions, divination is conducted by spiritual specialists who may also serve as healers or magicians, using similar tools and spiritual frameworks to diagnose and resolve personal or communal issues.

In ceremonial Western occultism, systems like the Enochian tradition of John Dee, or the Golden Dawn’s integration of Kabbalah and tarot, demonstrate the deliberate fusion of magical and divinatory disciplines. These systems treat divination not only as a tool for information but as a means of spiritual elevation.

3.4 Psychological Reinterpretation of Magical Thinking

From a scientific humanist perspective, the connection between magic and divination can be understood symbolically rather than literally. They represent the human drive to discover meaning, cope with uncertainty, and assert a sense of agency in the face of the unknown. Rather than dismissing them entirely as irrational, they can be recognized as part of the deep structure of human psychology and culture.


Though magic and divination are not supported by empirical evidence in the way natural sciences are, their persistent appeal underscores a profound aspect of the human experience: the hunger for connection between inner experience and outer world, and the use of symbol and story to navigate that connection.


Varieties of Astrology Beyond Forecasting

Astrology is often popularly associated with fortune-telling—daily horoscopes, compatibility charts, and predictions of future events. However, this narrow view overlooks the diversity within astrological practice. Many branches of astrology do not focus on prediction at all, but instead aim to uncover correlations between celestial patterns and human experience, or to support self-reflection, historical analysis, or even environmental study. Understanding these distinctions is essential to evaluating astrology from a scientific humanist perspective.

4.1 Natal Astrology

Natal astrology is the interpretation of an individual’s birth chart, which is a symbolic map of the sky at the moment and place of one’s birth. Practitioners analyze planetary positions, zodiac signs, and the angles (aspects) between them to describe a person’s character, tendencies, and psychological patterns. While future potentials may be discussed, the primary aim is often to explore identity and personal dynamics, not to predict specific events.

4.2 Psychological Astrology

Rooted in depth psychology and popularized by figures such as Dane Rudhyar and Liz Greene, psychological astrology emphasizes inner development over outer prediction. It views the birth chart as a symbolic expression of the psyche, rich with archetypes that correspond to unconscious drives, fears, and aspirations. The goal is therapeutic—helping individuals gain insight into themselves and navigate life with greater awareness.

4.3 Locational Astrology (Astrocartography)

This branch explores how geographic locations interact with an individual’s birth chart. By projecting planetary positions onto maps of the Earth, astrologers suggest that different places may enhance or inhibit various aspects of a person’s life—relationships, career, creativity, etc. Again, the focus is not on prediction but on subjective resonance and personal optimization.

4.4 Natural Astrology

Natural astrology deals not with human affairs but with physical phenomena. It includes:

  • Astro-meteorology: forecasting weather based on celestial configurations
  • Earthquake prediction: hypothesized correlations between planetary alignments and seismic activity
  • Solar cycles: tracking sunspots and planetary influences on biological and atmospheric rhythms

While still speculative and lacking conclusive scientific support, natural astrology is conceptually different from supernatural belief. Like tides influenced by lunar gravity, some proponents argue for physical correlations that are not mystical but natural—even if not yet fully understood.

4.5 Electional Astrology

Electional astrology helps determine the most auspicious time to initiate a particular action—launching a business, getting married, undergoing surgery, etc. It does not claim to predict outcomes, but instead assumes that certain cosmic patterns are more harmonious for certain activities. The astrologer’s role is to align the chosen time with the symbolic “rhythm” of the sky.

4.6 Historical Astrology

Rather than predicting the future, historical astrology analyzes past patterns. Scholars like Richard Tarnas have explored correlations between major historical periods and astrological cycles, arguing that broad archetypal themes unfold over centuries in synchrony with planetary movements. This approach treats astrology more as a lens of cultural and mythic interpretation than a predictive science.

4.7 Rectification

Rectification is an astrological technique used when an individual’s exact time of birth is unknown. By examining known life events (e.g., marriage, career changes, accidents), astrologers work backward to approximate the most likely birth time that aligns with these occurrences. While used as a methodological tool, rectification does not involve forecasting, but retroactive symbolic analysis.


Together, these diverse branches reveal that astrology is not monolithic, nor is it always predictive. Much of its practice involves symbolic interpretation, psychological insight, and pattern recognition. While these elements do not meet scientific standards of evidence, they speak to astrology’s adaptability and its capacity to serve as a mirror for human inquiry and reflection.

Astrology and the Limits of Scientific Testing

From a scientific standpoint, any system that makes claims about the nature of reality must be subjected to empirical testing. This includes astrology, which often asserts causal or correlational relationships between celestial bodies and human behavior, personality, or fate. However, when subjected to the standards of scientific inquiry—such as falsifiability, replicability, and predictive accuracy—astrology encounters significant methodological challenges.

5.1 The Scientific Method and Falsifiability

The scientific method requires that any hypothesis must be falsifiable—that is, capable of being proven wrong through observation or experiment. Many astrological claims are too vague or metaphorical to meet this criterion. Statements like “You may feel conflicted today, but clarity will come soon” are difficult to disprove, making them scientifically meaningless even if personally compelling.

Controlled studies attempting to verify astrological predictions have repeatedly failed to show results above chance. Meta-analyses, such as those conducted by Shawn Carlson (1985) and others, have found that astrologers are no better than random guessing when it comes to matching birth charts to individuals or predicting specific outcomes. These findings are consistent with the lack of a known causal mechanism linking planetary positions to complex human traits.

5.2 Subjectivity, Ambiguity, and Symbolic Language

Astrology is fundamentally symbolic, not mechanistic. It operates more like poetry or mythology than like physics. Practitioners often emphasize archetypes, metaphors, and intuitive insight—elements that are difficult to quantify or standardize. While this richness may enhance its psychological or cultural value, it undermines astrology’s capacity to function as a science in the conventional sense.

Even among astrologers, interpretations of the same chart can vary widely, depending on the system (Western, Vedic, sidereal), technique (whole sign vs. Placidus houses), and the astrologer’s personal intuition. This internal inconsistency poses further challenges for empirical validation.

5.3 The Appeal of Personalized Information

Astrology’s appeal often lies in its personalization. Birth charts are calculated using exact times and locations, creating a sense of precision and uniqueness. However, psychological studies reveal that individuals tend to accept generalized descriptions as highly accurate if they believe the information is tailored to them—a phenomenon known as the Barnum Effect.

For example, statements like “You have untapped potential” or “You value your independence but also need connection” are nearly universally applicable. When presented in the authoritative context of astrology, people tend to interpret them as meaningful and specific.

5.4 Confirmation Bias and Selective Memory

People also tend to remember information that confirms their existing beliefs and dismiss what contradicts them—confirmation bias. In astrology, this means that clients recall when predictions seem accurate or meaningful, while disregarding misses or ambiguities. Over time, this creates the illusion of accuracy and reinforces belief, even in the absence of objective validation.

5.5 Absence of a Testable Mechanism

Unlike meteorology or genetics, astrology lacks a physical mechanism to explain how or why planets would influence individual psychology or fate. Gravitational or electromagnetic effects from distant planets are negligible on the human body. Without a plausible mechanism, astrology remains metaphorical or speculative—not scientific.


Despite these limitations, astrology continues to be used and valued by millions. From a scientific humanist perspective, the question is not whether astrology should be banned or ridiculed, but how it should be understood: not as a science, but as a symbolic language—rich in psychological insight, but fundamentally untestable by empirical means.

Astrology, Divination, and Psychology

Though astrology and divination lack scientific credibility as predictive systems, they remain psychologically compelling. Their enduring popularity suggests that their value may lie not in forecasting external events, but in facilitating inner exploration, narrative identity, and emotional meaning-making. From the standpoint of psychology—particularly depth, cognitive, and cultural psychology—these practices reveal important dimensions of human cognition and behavior.

6.1 Seeking Meaning and Coping with Uncertainty

Human beings are meaning-making creatures. In times of personal transition, stress, or crisis, astrology and divination can provide a temporary framework of order. They offer symbolic maps of a chaotic reality and suggest interpretive anchors to navigate ambiguity. For many, this is less about believing in fate than about creating a coherent story during periods of uncertainty.

Whether through a birth chart or a tarot reading, such systems present the user with archetypal structures—symbols of change, growth, blockage, and hope—that help organize subjective experience.

6.2 The Barnum Effect and Confirmation Bias

One of the most studied cognitive phenomena in the psychology of belief is the Barnum Effect: the tendency for individuals to accept vague, generalized personality descriptions as uniquely applicable to themselves. Astrology often thrives on this effect, offering statements that feel profound precisely because they are emotionally resonant and broadly inclusive.

Confirmation bias further strengthens belief. People are more likely to notice, remember, and give weight to accurate-seeming or flattering parts of a reading while ignoring inaccuracies. This selective attention makes astrology and divination appear more accurate than they actually are.

6.3 Projection and Symbolic Interpretation

In both astrology and divination, individuals often project unconscious material—fears, desires, memories—onto ambiguous or symbolic content. A tarot card or astrological transit may serve as a mirror in which the querent sees aspects of their own psyche.

This is similar to the psychological mechanism at work in projective tests, such as the Rorschach inkblot test. The symbol becomes a stimulus for introspection, with meaning generated not from the symbol itself, but from the personal interpretation imposed upon it.

6.4 Self-Reflection and Personal Growth

When used consciously, these symbolic systems can become tools for self-reflection and personal development. Much like guided journaling or meditation, they encourage contemplation of one’s motivations, values, relationships, and aspirations. By externalizing internal conflict into symbolic language, the user may gain emotional clarity—even if the system lacks objective validity.

As Jennifer Freed, PhD, notes, astrology can act as “a fabulous rail down an exquisite staircase”—a supportive structure that allows one to move forward more mindfully. In this metaphor, astrology does not dictate the path, but provides a symbolic handle for reflection and orientation.

6.5 Jungian Perspectives and the Collective Unconscious

Carl Jung, the founder of analytical psychology, regarded astrology as a symbolic expression of the collective unconscious—a shared repository of archetypal patterns inherited across humanity. He did not view astrology as scientifically causal, but rather as mythically resonant.

Jung’s concept of synchronicity—the meaningful coincidence of inner and outer events—provided a theoretical framework for why symbolic systems like astrology might feel subjectively significant. For Jungians, astrology operates not in the domain of fact, but of meaning.

6.6 Cultural Identity and Spiritual Belonging

Astrology and divination are also embedded within larger cultural and spiritual frameworks. In many traditions, these practices are not isolated hobbies but part of religious cosmologies, rituals, and communal life. They can serve to reaffirm identity, connect individuals with ancestors or deities, and participate in shared worldviews.

Even in secular contexts, astrology often fosters a sense of belonging. Communities form around shared astrological beliefs, language, and practices, offering emotional support and identity affirmation.

6.7 Coping with Ambiguity and the Need for Certainty

Modern life confronts individuals with constant uncertainty. For many, astrology provides a symbolic grammar to reduce that ambiguity. It suggests that life is not random, that patterns can be discerned, and that personal growth follows intelligible cycles.

Psychologically, this is a coping mechanism. The promise of understanding—even if symbolic or illusory—can offer genuine comfort. As such, astrology becomes a narrative strategy for navigating life, not a substitute for scientific knowledge, but a tool for existential reassurance.


Viewed through the lens of psychology, astrology and divination are not sciences, but human technologies of meaning. They draw on deep structures of cognition—projection, bias, narrative identity—to provide frameworks of symbolic understanding. For a scientific humanist, the key is not to affirm these systems as factual, but to understand their psychological and cultural functions, and to encourage their ethical and self-aware use.

Critical Reflections and Humanist Evaluation

A scientific humanist view of astrology and divination neither blindly accepts nor dismissively mocks these practices. Instead, it seeks to understand their enduring appeal, distinguish their symbolic value from empirical truth, and evaluate their use in terms of human flourishing, autonomy, and integrity. This section offers a critical yet compassionate appraisal grounded in the core principles of humanism: reason, ethics, curiosity, and respect for human dignity.

7.1 Recognizing Psychological and Symbolic Utility

Astrology and divination can offer frameworks for self-reflection, emotional regulation, and narrative coherence. Used consciously, they may function similarly to literature, myth, or art—tools that help individuals reflect on their experiences and articulate internal states. From this perspective, they need not be “true” in the scientific sense to be psychologically useful.

Moreover, these practices may play therapeutic roles, supporting emotional exploration and serving as non-clinical gateways into introspection. Just as reading a novel can spark insight, engaging with symbolic systems can help one reframe dilemmas, identify values, or confront fears—provided that the user maintains a critical awareness.

7.2 Ethical Concerns and Misuse

While symbolic practices can support personal growth, they also carry ethical risks when used uncritically or manipulatively:

  • False authority: Presenting astrological or divinatory claims as objective truth can mislead vulnerable individuals or inhibit rational decision-making.
  • Determinism: Rigid belief in fate or planetary influence may disempower individuals, leading them to abdicate responsibility or avoid necessary change.
  • Exploitation: Commercial or cult-like exploitation can arise when practitioners assert mystical authority and extract financial or emotional dependence.

From a humanist standpoint, ethical use of such tools requires informed consent, psychological literacy, and transparency about the metaphorical—rather than literal—nature of the insights provided.

7.3 Distinguishing Symbolism from Science

One of the fundamental tasks of a scientifically literate society is the ability to distinguish between metaphor and mechanism, narrative and nature. Astrology and divination operate in the symbolic domain; science operates in the empirical domain. The two are not inherently opposed—but they are categorically different.

Conflating the two leads to confusion. When astrology is marketed as a science or used to make medical, legal, or financial decisions, it crosses a boundary that demands critical scrutiny. Conversely, rejecting all non-scientific practices as valueless overlooks the richness of symbolic life and the importance of meaning-making in human psychology.

7.4 Humanism and the Search for Meaning

Humanism affirms the importance of reason and evidence while also recognizing that human beings are emotional, imaginative, and spiritual creatures. The value of astrology and divination, if any, lies not in their ability to predict or explain the world, but in their capacity to illuminate the inner world.

As symbolic languages, they can help individuals ask better questions: “What am I struggling with?” “What patterns do I repeat?” “What potential am I afraid of?” When used with humility, honesty, and awareness, such systems can be tools of introspection—not truth claims, but invitations to reflect.


From the scientific humanist perspective, astrology and divination are not rejected outright, but evaluated as meaning systems. They should not substitute for science, medicine, or reasoned judgment. Yet when used responsibly, they may serve as mirrors of the mind, poetic lenses for inner life, and cultural rituals that help individuals orient themselves in a complex world.


Conclusion: Mystery, Meaning, and the Tools We Trust

Astrology and divination speak to a fundamental human need: the desire to understand ourselves and the world around us. Across cultures and centuries, these practices have endured not because they withstand scientific scrutiny, but because they fulfill psychological and symbolic roles. They offer meaning where certainty is absent, patterns where randomness prevails, and orientation where confusion reigns.

From the standpoint of scientific humanism, we affirm that science is humanity’s most reliable method for understanding and influencing the external world. Its power lies in its systematic approach: observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and verification. Science has transformed medicine, extended lifespans, decoded the genome, and placed telescopes among the stars. Yet it is not infallible. It is a human process—subject to revision, error, and evolving paradigms.

Astrology and divination, by contrast, do not offer testable knowledge. Their systems cannot be falsified or confirmed through empirical observation. They reflect an older mode of knowing—symbolic, intuitive, and mythopoetic. But this does not render them meaningless. They illuminate aspects of the inner world, help individuals construct narratives of identity and purpose, and connect them to cultural and spiritual traditions.

A scientific humanist approach does not pit reason against imagination. Rather, it encourages both—each in its proper domain. It calls for:

  • Critical thinking, to protect against superstition, exploitation, and false authority
  • Psychological insight, to appreciate the symbolic and introspective value of mythic systems
  • Ethical responsibility, to use symbolic tools with transparency and care
  • Curiosity and humility, to acknowledge what we know, and to remain open to what we do not

In the end, we must ask not only whether a system is true, but also how it is used. If astrology or divination serve as tools of reflection, healing, and empowerment—without making unscientific claims to certainty or control—then they can have a place within a mature, pluralistic culture. Not as science. Not as truth. But as mirrors, metaphors, and meaning-making devices in the great project of human understanding.


Appendix: A Guide to the Basic Beliefs of Astrology

Astrology is a complex symbolic system that interprets the positions and movements of celestial bodies as meaningful indicators of human experience. While diverse schools of astrology exist around the world, most Western astrology shares a common set of core principles. This section outlines those foundational beliefs in simplified form for the curious reader.


1. The Natal Chart (“Birth Chart”)

At the heart of astrology is the natal chart—a symbolic map of the sky at the exact moment and location of a person’s birth. It is a circular diagram divided into twelve segments, each representing different aspects of life. The chart records the positions of the Sun, Moon, and planets relative to the Earth, and places them within zodiac signs and houses.

  • Date, time, and place of birth are used to generate the chart.
  • The chart is unique to each individual and is considered to reflect their personality, tendencies, and life themes.

2. The Zodiac: 12 Archetypal Signs

The zodiac is a band of the sky divided into twelve equal parts, each named after a constellation. These twelve signs represent archetypal qualities or modes of being.

Zodiac SignArchetype/EssenceElementModality
AriesThe Warrior / InitiatorFireCardinal
TaurusThe Builder / StabilizerEarthFixed
GeminiThe Communicator / ThinkerAirMutable
CancerThe Nurturer / ProtectorWaterCardinal
LeoThe Performer / LeaderFireFixed
VirgoThe Analyst / HealerEarthMutable
LibraThe Diplomat / ArtistAirCardinal
ScorpioThe Transformer / IntuitiveWaterFixed
SagittariusThe Explorer / PhilosopherFireMutable
CapricornThe Strategist / ClimberEarthCardinal
AquariusThe Visionary / RebelAirFixed
PiscesThe Mystic / EmpathWaterMutable

Each planet’s position in a zodiac sign is said to influence how its energy manifests.


3. The Planets: Symbolic Forces

In astrology, planets symbolize core aspects of the psyche or life forces. Each has a traditional set of meanings:

  • Sun – Core identity, ego, life force
  • Moon – Emotions, instincts, inner world
  • Mercury – Communication, thought, learning
  • Venus – Love, beauty, values
  • Mars – Desire, action, assertiveness
  • Jupiter – Expansion, luck, wisdom
  • Saturn – Structure, discipline, responsibility
  • Uranus – Innovation, rebellion, awakening
  • Neptune – Dreams, spirituality, illusion
  • Pluto – Power, transformation, rebirth

Traditional astrology also includes Chiron (wounding and healing), the Lunar Nodes (karma and life path), and various asteroids or Arabic Parts.


4. The Houses: Life Domains

The natal chart is divided into twelve houses, each corresponding to a different sphere of life:

  1. Self, identity, appearance
  2. Money, possessions, values
  3. Communication, siblings, learning
  4. Home, family, emotional foundation
  5. Creativity, romance, children
  6. Work, service, health
  7. Partnerships, marriage, contracts
  8. Death, rebirth, shared resources
  9. Philosophy, travel, higher education
  10. Career, public image, authority
  11. Community, friendship, ideals
  12. Spirituality, solitude, the unconscious

A planet in a house describes how that planetary energy manifests in that life area.


5. Aspects: Planetary Relationships

Aspects are angular relationships between planets. These angles are believed to show how different energies interact—harmoniously or with tension.

  • Conjunction (0°) – Unity, intensity
  • Sextile (60°) – Cooperation, ease
  • Square (90°) – Challenge, tension
  • Trine (120°) – Harmony, natural flow
  • Opposition (180°) – Polarity, balance or conflict

These patterns are interpreted as internal psychological dynamics or external life events.


6. Types of Astrology

There are many different types and applications of astrology:

  • Natal Astrology – interpreting personality and life patterns
  • Transits and Progressions – tracking how current planetary movements affect a natal chart
  • Synastry and Composite Charts – relationship compatibility
  • Electional Astrology – choosing auspicious times
  • Horary Astrology – answering specific questions based on the moment they are asked
  • Locational Astrology – how different places affect the individual
  • Medical, Mundane, and Financial Astrology – applied to health, world events, or markets

7. Interpretive Approach

Astrology is not a deterministic system in modern practice. Most contemporary astrologers emphasize:

  • Symbolism over certainty
  • Potential over fate
  • Free will within influence
  • Personal growth and reflection, not prediction

Astrology’s power lies not in forecasting unavoidable outcomes, but in helping people better understand themselves and navigate life with increased awareness.


A Final Note

For scientific humanists, astrology is best approached not as a science, but as a symbolic language—a cultural artifact rich in metaphor, myth, and psychological insight. While it should not be used to replace evidence-based decision-making, it may serve as a poetic or contemplative tool for those who find meaning in its archetypes.

Scroll to Top